ERC-20 Transfers

ERC-20 tokens provide a standardized format for fungible digital assets within EVM ecosystems. The process of transferring ERC-20 tokens into a database is fundamental, unlocking opportunities for data analysis, tracking, and the development of innovative solutions.

This guide is part of a series of tutorials on how you can stream transfer data into your datawarehouse using Mirror pipelines. Here we will be focusing on ERC-20 Transfers, visit the following guides for other types of Transfers:

• Native Transfers
• ERC-721 Transfers
• ERC-1155 Transfers

​

What you’ll need

1. A Goldky account and the CLI installed

2. A basic understanding of the Mirror product
3. A destination sink to write your data to. In this example, we will use the PostgreSQL Sink

​

Introduction

In order to stream all the ERC-20 Transfers of a chain there are two potential methods available:

1. Use the readily available ERC-20 dataset for the chain you are interested in: this is the easiest and quickest method to get you streaming token transfers into your sink of choice with minimum code.
2. Build the ERC-20 Transfers pipeline from scratch using raw or decoded logs: this method takes more code and time to implement but it’s a great way to learn about how you can use decoding functions in case you want to build more customized pipelines.

Let’s explore both method below with more detail:

​

Using the ERC-20 Transfers Source Dataset

Every EVM chain has its own ERC-20 dataset available for you to use as source in your pipelines. You can check this by running the goldsky dataset list command and finding the EVM of your choice. For this example, let’s use apex chain and create a simple pipeline definition using its ERC-20 dataset that writes the data into a PostgreSQL instance:

name: apex-erc20-pipeline
version: 1
status: ACTIVE
resource_size: s
apiVersion: 3
sources:
  apex.erc20_transfers:
    dataset_name: apex.erc20_transfers
    version: 1.0.0
    type: dataset
    start_at: earliest
transforms: {}
sinks:
  postgres_apex.erc20_transfers_public_apex_erc20_transfers:
    type: postgres
    table: apex_erc20_transfers
    schema: public
    secret_name: <YOUR_SECRET>
    description: 'Postgres sink for Dataset: apex.erc20_transfers'
    from: apex.erc20_transfers

You can now run this pipeline with the following command:

goldsky pipeline apply apex-erc20-transfers.yaml

That’s it! You should soon start seeing ERC-20 token transfers in your database.

​

Building ERC-20 Transfers from scratch using logs

In the previous method we just explored, the ERC-20 datasets that we used as source to the pipeline encapsulates all the decoding logic that’s explained in this section. Read on if you are interested in learning how it’s implemented in case you want to consider extending or modifying this logic yourself.

There are two ways that we can go about building this token transfers pipeline from scratch:

1. Use the raw_logs Direct Indexing dataset for that chain in combination with Decoding Transform Functions using the ABI of a specific ERC-20 Contract.
2. Use the decoded_logs Direct Indexing dataset for that chain in which the decoding process has already been done by Goldsky. This is only available for certain chains as you can check in this list.

We’ll primarily focus on the first decoding method using raw_logs and decoding functions as it’s the default and most used way of decoding; we’ll also present an example using decoded_logs and highlight the differences between the two.

​

Building ERC-20 Tranfers using Decoding Transform Functions

In this example, we will stream all the Transfer events of all the ERC-20 Tokens for the Scroll chain. To that end, we will dinamically fetch the ABI of the USDT token from the Scrollscan API (available here) and use it to identify all the same events for the tokens in the chain. We have decided to use the ABI of USDT token contract for this example but any other ERC-20 compliant token would also work.

We need to differentiate ERC-20 token transfers from ERC-721 (NFT) transfers since they have the same event signature in decoded data: Transfer(address,address,uint256). However, if we look closely at their event definitions we can appreciate that the number of topics differ:

• ERC-20: event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _value)
• ERC-721: event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 indexed _tokenId)

ERC-20 Transfer events have three topics (one topic for event signature + 2 topics for the indexed params). NFTs on the other hand have four topics as they have one more indexed param in the event signature. We will use this as a filter in our pipeline transform to only transfer ERC-20 Transfer events.

Let’s now see all these concepts applied in an example pipeline definition:

​

Pipeline Definition

• v3
• v2 (deprecated)

name: scroll-erc20-transfers
apiVersion: 3
sources:
  my_scroll_mainnet_raw_logs:
    type: dataset
    dataset_name: scroll_mainnet.raw_logs
    version: 1.0.0
transforms:
  scroll_decoded:
    primary_key: id
    # Fetch the ABI from scrollscan for USDT
    sql: >
      SELECT
        *,
        _gs_log_decode(
            _gs_fetch_abi('https://api.scrollscan.com/api?module=contract&action=getabi&address=0xc7d86908ccf644db7c69437d5852cedbc1ad3f69', 'etherscan'),
            `topics`,
            `data`
        ) AS `decoded`
        FROM my_scroll_mainnet_raw_logs
        WHERE topics LIKE '0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef%'
        AND SPLIT_INDEX(topics, ',', 3) IS NULL
  scroll_clean:
    primary_key: id
    # Clean up the previous transform, unnest the values from the `decoded` object
    sql: >
      SELECT
        *,
        decoded.event_params AS `event_params`,
        decoded.event_signature AS `event_name`
        FROM scroll_decoded
        WHERE decoded IS NOT NULL
        AND decoded.event_signature = 'Transfer'
  scroll_20_transfers:
    primary_key: id
    sql: >
      SELECT
        id,
        address AS token_id,
        lower(event_params[1]) AS sender,
        lower(event_params[2]) AS recipient,
        lower(event_params[3]) AS `value`,
        event_name,
        block_number,
        block_hash,
        log_index,
        transaction_hash,
        transaction_index
        FROM scroll_clean
sinks:
  scroll_20_sink:
    type: postgres
    table: erc20_transfers
    schema: mirror
    secret_name: <YOUR_SECRET>
    description: Postgres sink for ERC20 transfers
    from: scroll_20_transfers

There are three transforms in this pipeline definition which we’ll explain how they work:

SELECT
  *,
  _gs_log_decode(
      _gs_fetch_abi('https://api.scrollscan.com/api?module=contract&action=getabi&address=0xc7d86908ccf644db7c69437d5852cedbc1ad3f69', 'etherscan'),
      `topics`,
      `data`
  ) AS `decoded`
  FROM scroll_mainnet.raw_logs
  WHERE topics LIKE '0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef%'
  AND SPLIT_INDEX(topics, ',', 3) IS NULL

As explained in the Decoding Contract Events guide we first make use of the _gs_fetch_abi function to get the ABI from Scrollscan and pass it as first argument to the function _gs_log_decode to decode its topics and data. We store the result in a decoded ROW which we unnest on the next transform. We also limit the decoding to the relevent events using the topic filter and SPLIT_INDEX to only include ERC-20 transfers.

• topics LIKE '0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef%': topics is a comma separated string. Each value in the string is a hash. The first is the hash of the full event_signature (including arguments), in our case Transfer(address,address,uint256) for ERC-20, which is hashed to 0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef. We use LIKE to only consider the first signature, with a % at the end, which acts as a wildcard.
• SPLIT_INDEX(topics, ',', 3) IS NULL: as mentioned in the introduction, ERC-20 transfers share the same event_signature as ERC-721 transfers. The difference between them is the number of topics associated with the event. ERC-721 transfers have four topics, and ERC-20 transfers have three.

SELECT
  *,
  decoded.event_params AS `event_params`,
  decoded.event_signature AS `event_name`
  FROM scroll_decoded
  WHERE decoded IS NOT NULL
  AND decoded.event_signature = 'Transfer'

In this second transform, we take the event_params and event_signature from the result of the decoding. We then filter the query on:

• decoded IS NOT NULL: to leave out potential null results from the decoder
• decoded.event_signature = 'Transfer': the decoder will output the event name as event_signature, excluding its arguments. We use it to filter only for Transfer events.

SELECT
  id,
  address AS token_id,
  lower(event_params[1]) AS sender,
  lower(event_params[2]) AS recipient,
  lower(event_params[3]) AS `value`,
  event_name,
  block_number,
  block_hash,
  log_index,
  transaction_hash,
  transaction_index
  FROM scroll_clean

In this last transform we are essentially selecting all the Transfer information we are interested in having in our database. We’ve included a number of columns that you may or may not need, the main columns needed for most purposes are: id, address (if you are syncing multiple contract addresses), sender, recipient, token_id, and value.

• id: This is the Goldsky provided id, it is a string composed of the dataset name, block hash, and log index, which is unique per event, here’s an example: log_0x60eaf5a2ab37c73cf1f3bbd32fc17f2709953192b530d75aadc521111f476d6c_18
• address AS token_id: We use the lower function here to lower-case the address to make using this data simpler downstream, we also rename the column to token_id to make it more explicit.
• lower(event_params[1]) AS sender: Here we continue to lower-case values for consistency. In this case we’re using the first element of the event_params array (using a 1-based index), and renaming it to sender. Each event parameter maps to an argument to the event_signature.
• lower(event_params[2]) AS recipient: Like the previous column, we’re pulling the second element in the event_params array and renaming it to recipient.
• lower(event_params[3]) AS value: We’re pulling the third element in the event_params array and renaming it to value to represent the amount of the token_id sent in the transfer.

Lastly, we are also adding more block metadata to the query to add context to each transaction:

event_name,
block_number,
block_hash,
log_index,
transaction_hash,
transaction_index

It’s worth mentioning that in this example we are interested in all the ERC-20 Transfer events but if you would like to filter for specific contract addresses you could simply add a WHERE filter to this query with address you are interested in, like: WHERE address IN ('0xBC4CA0EdA7647A8aB7C2061c2E118A18a936f13D', '0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c13d831ec7')

​

Deploying the pipeline

Our last step is to deploy this pipeline and start sinking ERC-20 transfer data into our database. Assuming we are using the same file name for the pipeline configuration as in this example, we can use the CLI pipeline create command like this:

goldsky pipeline create scroll-erc20-transfers --definition-path scroll-erc20-transfers.yaml

After some time, you should see the pipeline start streaming Transfer data into your sink.

Here’s an example transfer record from our sink:

We can find this transaction in Scrollscan. We see that it corresponds to the second internal transfers of Wrapped ETH (WETH):

This concludes our successful deployment of a Mirror pipeline streaming ERC-20 Tokens from Scroll chain into our database using inline decoders. Congrats! 🎉

​

ERC-20 Transfers using decoded datasets

As explained in the Introduction, Goldsky provides decoded datasets for Raw Logs and Raw Traces for a number of different chains. You can check this list to see if the chain you are interested in has these decoded datasets. In these cases, there is no need for us to run Decoding Transform Functions as the dataset itself will already contain the event signature and event params decoded.

Click on the button below to see an example pipeline definition for streaming ERC-20 tokens on the Ethereum chain using the decoded_logs dataset.

sources:
  - referenceName: ethereum.decoded_logs
    version: 1.0.0
    type: dataset
    startAt: earliest
    description: Decoded logs for events emitted from contracts. Contains the
      decoded event signature and event parameters, contract address, data,
      topics, and metadata for the block and transaction.
transforms:
  - type: sql
    referenceName: ethereum_20_transfers
    primaryKey: id
    description: ERC20 Transfers
    sql: >-
      SELECT
              address AS token_id,
              lower(event_params[1]) AS sender,
              lower(event_params[2]) AS recipient,
              lower(event_params[3]) AS `value`,
              raw_log.block_number       AS block_number,
              raw_log.block_hash         AS block_hash,
              raw_log.log_index          AS log_index,
              raw_log.transaction_hash   AS transaction_hash,
              raw_log.transaction_index  AS transaction_index,
              id
              FROM ethereum.decoded_logs WHERE raw_log.topics LIKE '0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef%'
              AND SPLIT_INDEX(raw_log.topics, ',', 3) IS NULL
sinks:
  - type: postgres
    table: erc20_transfers
    schema: mirror
    secretName: <YOUR SECRET>
    description: Postgres sink for ERC20 transfers
    referenceName: ethereum_20_sink
    sourceStreamName: ethereum_20_transfers

You can appreciate that it’s pretty similar to the inline decoding pipeline method but here we simply create a transform which does the filtering based on the raw_log.topics just as we did on the previous method.

Assuming we are using the same filename for the pipeline configuration as in this example and that you have added your own secret we can deploy this pipeline with the CLI pipeline create command:

goldsky pipeline create ethereum-erc20-transfers --definition-path ethereum-decoded-logs-erc20-transfers.yaml

​

Conclusion

In this guide, we have learnt how Mirror simplifies streaming ERC-20 Transfer events into your database.

We have first looked into the easy way of achieving this, simply by making use of the readily available ERC-20 dataset of the EVM chaina and using its as the source to our pipeline.

Next, we have deep dived into the standard decoding method using Decoding Transform Functions, implementing an example on Scroll chain. We have also looked into an example implementation using the decoded_logs dataset for Ethereum. Both are great decoding methods and depending on your use case and dataset availability you might prefer one over the other.

With Mirror, developers gain flexibility and efficiency in integrating blockchain data, opening up new possibilities for applications and insights. Experience the transformative power of Mirror today and redefine your approach to blockchain data integration.

Can't find what you're looking for? Reach out to us at support@goldsky.com for help.